Citation and commencement

1.—(1) These Regulations may be cited as the Employer-Financed Retirement Benefits (Excluded Benefits for Tax Purposes) Regulations 2007 and come into force on 8th January 2008.

(2) These Regulations have effect for the tax year 2006-07 and subsequent tax years.

Interpretation

2.—(1) In these Regulations—

“employee” includes a former employee;

“employer” includes—

“ill-health” means physical or mental impairment;

“ITEPA 2003” means the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003;

“relevant benefit” means a benefit to which Chapter 2 of Part 6 of ITEPA 2003 applies.

(2) References to a member of a person’s family shall be construed in accordance with section 721(4) of ITEPA 2003(2), but this is subject to regulation 3(4).

Excluded benefits

3.—(1) A relevant benefit—

(a) that is provided (or to be provided) in any of the circumstances mentioned in paragraphs (a) to (c) of section 393B(1) of ITEPA 2003;

(b) that is described in the Schedule; and

(c) that is provided to a qualifying person,

is an excluded benefit for the purposes of section 393B(3)(d) of ITEPA 2003.

(2) The following are qualifying persons for the purposes of paragraph (1)—

(a) in the case of the benefit described in paragraph 2 (accommodation provided for performance of duties - employees) or paragraph 16 (equipment for disabled employees) of the Schedule, the employee,

(b) in the case of the benefit described in paragraph 3 of the Schedule (accommodation provided for performance of duties – members of employees’ families), a member of the employee’s family,

(c) in the case of any other benefit described in Part 1 of the Schedule—

(i) the employee, and

(ii) after any of the events specified in paragraph (3), a member of the employee’s family,

(d) in the case of any other benefit described in Part 3 of the Schedule—

(i) the employee, and

(ii) after the employee’s death, a member of the employee’s family.

(3) The events mentioned in paragraph (2)(c)(ii) are—

(a) the employee’s death;

(b) the employee’s taking up residence elsewhere (than in the living accommodation concerned) as a result of ill-health;

(c) the employee’s taking up residence elsewhere (than in the living accommodation concerned) following—

(i) a separation,

(ii) the annulment or divorce of a marriage, or

(iii) the nullity or dissolution of a civil partnership.

(4) Where the event mentioned in paragraph (3)(c)(ii) or (iii) has occurred, the ex-spouse or ex-civil partner shall be treated as a member of the employee’s family.

Regulation 3

SCHEDULE

PART 1 LIVING ACCOMMODATION AND RELATED BENEFITS

Accommodation provided by local authority

1.  Living accommodation if—

(a) it is provided by a local authority, and

(b) Chapter 5 of Part 3 of ITEPA 2003 (taxable benefits: living accommodation) would not have applied to the provision of that accommodation by virtue of section 98 of that Act (accommodation provided by local authority) if the employee had remained in that employment.

Accommodation provided for performance of duties - employees

2.—(1) Living accommodation if—

(a) the employee had been in continuous occupation of the same or similar living accommodation during the five years immediately preceding the employee’s retirement,

(b) throughout that period of five years—

(i) Chapter 5 of Part 3 of ITEPA 2003 did not apply to the provision of that accommodation by virtue of section 99 of that Act (accommodation provided for performance of duties), and

(ii) for any tax year before 2003-04, the accommodation attracted similar treatment for tax purposes by virtue of an enactment that was restated by section 99,

(c) the employee continued to occupy the same or similar accommodation after retirement.

(2) In determining whether the occupation of living accommodation is continuous, the following breaks in occupation shall be disregarded—

(a) any one break not exceeding six months,

(b) breaks not exceeding one month each,

(c) breaks (of any duration) resulting from the employee’s ill health.

(3) Living accommodation is not within this paragraph if it is improved property.

Accommodation provided for performance of duties – members of employees’ families

3.—(1) Living accommodation provided to a member of the employee’s family after the employee’s death if—

(a) the employee died before retirement and Condition A is satisfied; or

(b) the employee died after retirement and Condition B is satisfied.

(2) Condition A is that—

(a) the employee had been in occupation of the same or similar living accommodation at any time during the five years immediately preceding the employee’s death,

(b) at any time during that period of five years—

(i) Chapter 5 of Part 3 of ITEPA 2003 did not apply to the provision of that accommodation by virtue of section 99 of that Act, or

(ii) for a tax year before 2003-04, the accommodation attracted similar treatment for tax purposes by virtue of an enactment that was restated by section 99,

(3) Condition B is that the living accommodation was living accommodation described in paragraph 2 immediately before the employee’s death.

(4) In determining whether the occupation of living accommodation is continuous, the breaks in occupation mentioned in paragraph 2(2) shall be disregarded.

(5) Living accommodation is not within this paragraph if it is improved property.

Accommodation provided for ministers of religion

4.—(1) Living accommodation if—

(a) the employee had been employed as a minister of a religious denomination—

(i) for the period of five years immediately preceding the employee’s retirement,

(ii) immediately preceding the employee’s death, or

(iii) if the employee retired immediately after a period of ill-health, immediately preceding the beginning of that period, and

(b) at any time while the employee had been a minister, either—

(i) Chapter 5 of Part 3 of ITEPA 2003 did not apply to the provision of that or some other living accommodation provided to the employee by the employer by virtue of section 99 of that Act, or

(ii) for a tax year before 2003-04, such accommodation attracted similar treatment for tax purposes by virtue of an enactment that was restated by section 99.

(2) The condition in sub-paragraph (1)(a)(iii) is not satisfied unless and until the employer has received evidence from a registered medical practitioner that the employee is incapable of carrying on the occupation.

Accommodation provided as result of security threat

5.  Living accommodation if—

(a) at any time before the employee’s retirement or death—

(i) Chapter 5 of Part 3 of ITEPA 2003 did not apply to the provision of that or similar accommodation provided to the employee by the employer by virtue of section 100 of that Act (accommodation provided as result of security threat), and

(ii) for any tax year before 2003-04, such accommodation attracted similar treatment for tax purposes by virtue of an enactment that was restated by section 100,

(b) except that the employment has been terminated, the conditions set out in paragraphs (a) to (c) of section 100 continue to be satisfied.

Removal expenses

6.—(1) A benefit provided by the employer in connection with a change of residence if—

(a) it is a benefit of a description within section 280 of ITEPA 2003;

(b) there would have been no liability to income tax by virtue of section 271 of ITEPA 2003 if—

(i) the benefit had been provided in the course of the employment,

(ii) the change of residence had met the conditions in section 273 of ITEPA 2003,

(iii) the last day of the tax year after that in which the change of residence occurred had constituted the limitation day;

(c) the former residence is living accommodation described in this Part.

(2) If the cash equivalent of the benefit determined in accordance with the rules in section 203 of ITEPA 2003 exceeds £8,000—

(a) the excess is not within the description in this paragraph; and

(b) in determining whether there would have been no liability to income tax by virtue of section 271 of ITEPA 2003 for the purposes of sub-paragraph (1)(b), the excess shall be disregarded.

Repairs and alterations to living accommodation

7.  Works—

(a) in respect of which there would have been no liability to income tax by virtue of section 313 of ITEPA 2003 if they had been carried out in relation to living accommodation provided by reason of the employee’s employment;

(b) that are carried out in relation to living accommodation described in this Part; and

(c) that do not have the effect of the living accommodation becoming improved property.

Council tax etc.paid for living accommodation

8.  Payments or reimbursements if—

(a) they are of a description within section 314(2) of ITEPA 2003;

(b) section 314 would have applied to them if the living accommodation had been of a description within subsection (1) of that section;

(c) they are in respect of living accommodation described in this Part.