The Compensation (Claims Management Services) Regulations 2006 © Crown Copyright 2006 Statutory Instruments printed from this website are printed under the superintendence and authority of the Controller of HMSO being the Queen's Printer of Acts of Parliament. The legislation contained on this web site is subject to Crown Copyright protection. It may be reproduced free of charge provided that it is reproduced accurately and that the source and copyright status of the material is made evident to users. It should be noted that the right to reproduce the text of Statutory Instruments does not extend to the Queen's Printer imprints which should be removed from any copies of the Statutory Instrument which are issued or made available to the public. This includes reproduction of the Statutory Instrument on the Internet and on intranet sites. The Royal Arms may be reproduced only where they are an integral part of the original document. The text of this Internet version of the Statutory Instrument which is published by the Queen's Printer of Acts of Parliament has been prepared to reflect the text as it was Made. A print version is also available and is published by The Stationery Office Limited as the The Compensation (Claims Management Services) Regulations 2006, ISBN 0110754972. The print version may be purchased by clicking here. Braille copies of this Statutory Instrument can also be purchased at the same price as the print edition by contacting TSO Customer Services on 0870 600 5522 or e-mail: customer.services@tso.co.uk. Further information about the publication of legislation on this website can be found by referring to the Frequently Asked Questions. To ensure fast access over slow connections, large documents have been segmented into "chunks". Where you see a "continue" button at the bottom of the page of text, this indicates that there is another chunk of text available.
These Regulations are made in exercise of the powers conferred by sections 8(8), 9 and 15 of the Compensation Act 2006[1] and the Schedule to that Act. A draft of this instrument has been laid before Parliament in accordance with section 15(10) of that Act and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament. Accordingly, the Secretary of State makes the following Regulations: Citation 1. These Regulations may be cited as the Compensation (Claims Management Services) Regulations 2006. Commencement 2. These Regulations come into force on the day after the day on which they are made. Definitions 3. In these Regulations—
Documents in electronic form
(b) an electronic communication.
(2) If a notice is served, or information is given, by means of fax transmission or an electronic communication, unless the contrary is proved the notice is taken to have been served or the information given on the business day following the day on which the fax or electronic communication was sent. Circumstances in which Regulator may waive requirement for authorisation 6. —(1) The Regulator may waive the requirement for authorisation in relation to a person if—
(b) the Regulator is satisfied that—
(ii) the waiver would not result in undue risk to persons whose interests the Act is intended to protect.
(2) The Regulator must give the person a written notice of the waiver.
(b) the person tells clients or potential clients in writing that the person is providing that service subject to the waiver, pending an exemption by order under section 6 of the Act; (c) the person meets standards of service recommended by the Secretary of State.
(3) If the Regulator imposes on a waiver a condition of the kind referred to in paragraph (2)(c), the Regulator must set out the standard in the notice of the waiver. Application for authorisations 8. —(1) A person must apply for authorisation in writing in the form approved by the Regulator for the purpose. (2) The person must supply the information and documents required by the form in accordance with any directions on it. (3) If the Regulator approves the use of an interactive system on line for the purposes of application, paragraph (2) requires an applicant to complete and submit an application, and provide documents, in accordance with the directions given by the interactive system. (4) If the Regulator requires—
(b) another document;
to consider an application, the Regulator may ask for the information or document by written notice to the applicant.
(b) there are no relevant proceedings (whether completed or not) in any court or tribunal, and in particular any proceedings in relation to financial services, consumer credit or consumer protection, against the applicant; (c) if the applicant holds or proposes to hold clients' money, the applicant has appropriate arrangements or proposed arrangements for holding such money; and (d) that the applicant has no arrangements with another person that might expose it to any conflict of interest.
(3) For the purposes of making a decision regarding the suitability of an applicant, the Regulator may have regard to—
(b) the applicant's management arrangements, including—
(ii) who is responsible for the applicant's financial and other management; (iii) measures to maintain its solvency; (iv) the provision of verified, certified or audited accounts; (v) any previous relationship with a company that has become insolvent, or against which an insolvency petition has been brought;
(c) the applicant's actual or proposed connections or arrangements with other persons, (including, in the case of an applicant that is a body corporate, its relationship with any parent or subsidiary company) and the applicant's arrangements to avoid conflicts of interest;
(4) In the case of an applicant other than an individual, it is a criterion for the grant of an application for authorisation that—
(b) in the case of an applicant that is a partnership or other body of persons, each of its members; and (c) each other person who appears to the Regulator to be able to exert significant influence on the applicant's policy or management;
is suitable to be associated with the provision of regulated claims management services of the kind to which the application relates.
(b) whether the individual has ever been disqualified as a company director; (c) any relevant proceedings (whether completed or not) of a body exercising functions in relation to a trade or profession, and in particular any proceedings that may result in the withdrawal or revocation of the right to practise a profession, engage in a business or provide a service; (d) any withdrawal or revocation of his right to practise a profession, engage in a business or provide a service; (e) his financial circumstances; (f) his qualifications and experience.
Time for deciding applications
(b) a condition as to the way in which the person provides the service; (c) that the person provides only a specified service or services; or (d) that the person provides a service only in specified circumstances.
(3) The Regulator may revoke the imposition of a condition on an authorisation if he is satisfied that it is no longer necessary for the authorisation to be subject to the condition.
(b) that the person complies with any applicable code of practice; (c) that if the person accepts referrals of potential clients from another person (not being a person required to be an authorised person), the person takes reasonable steps to ensure that the other person obtains the business in a way consistent with the rules; (d) that the person complies with any direction of the Regulator under Part 5 (which deals with indemnity insurance); (e) that the person permits inspection by the Regulator under Part 8 (which is about routine audit); (f) that in each year, if the Regulator so requires by notice in writing, the person certifies in writing to the Regulator that during the past year the person has complied with the conditions mentioned in sub-paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) and any other condition of the authorisation specified in the notice; (g) that in each year, within 1 month after the Regulator issues an invoice to the person for the annual fee, the person pays the Regulator the amount of that fee in accordance with the invoice; (h) that the person complies with any direction under regulation 27 or 28(2); (i) that the person implements, promptly and in full, any direction under regulation 29(1) or 29(3).
Grant and refusal of authorisations
(b) continues in effect until revoked or surrendered.
(4) If the Regulator grants an authorisation subject to a condition, the Regulator must set the condition out in the instrument of authorisation.
(b) a brief statement of the evidence on which the Regulator relied; and (c) a statement of the person's right to appeal to the Tribunal, including the Tribunal's address to which an appeal notice may be sent and the time limit for such an appeal.
Surrender of authorisations
(b) in any other case, on the day on which the Regulator receives it.
Determination of fees 15. —(1) The Regulator must, by written instrument, determine—
(b) annual fees, or a scale of annual fees, for authorisations.
(2) A determination under paragraph (1)(b) may provide for the fee to be calculated by reference to the annual turnover or expected annual turnover of the business of the applicant or authorised person concerned.
(b) may make different provision for different cases or circumstances; (c) may include transitional, incidental or consequential provisions; and (d) may provide for a fee of zero amount in specified circumstances.
(4) Before making such a determination, the Regulator must consult such persons as appear to him to represent the views of persons engaged in the provision of regulated claims management services, and such other organisations, as he considers appropriate.
(b) the applicant or authorised person has been otherwise overcharged.
(2) If an authorised person surrenders his authorisation, the Regulator may refund so much of the fee for that year as represents the difference between the amount paid and the amount that the Regulator is satisfied was properly due for the part of the year until the surrender. Directions about indemnity insurance 21. The Regulator may, by written notice, require an authorised person to take out a policy of professional indemnity insurance in accordance with specified conditions in respect of the person's activities in providing regulated claims management services. Rules 22. —(1) The Regulator must prescribe, in writing, rules for the professional conduct of authorised persons. (2) Before prescribing such rules, the Regulator must consult such persons as appear to him to represent the views of persons engaged in the provision of regulated claims management services, and such other organisations, as he considers appropriate. (3) The rules—
(b) may make different provision for different cases or circumstances; and (c) may include transitional, incidental or consequential provisions.
(4) The Regulator must not prescribe such rules unless the Secretary of State has approved a draft of the rules.
(b) in printed form.
(7) Rules prescribed under paragraph (1) have effect only from the date on which they are published in accordance with sub-paragraph (6)(a).
(b) the accounting practices to be adopted by authorised persons who hold clients' money; and (c) the establishment and operation by authorised persons of schemes for the reception, investigation and rectification of complaints about their professional services.
Codes of practice
(b) may make different provision for different cases or circumstances; and (c) may include transitional, incidental or consequential provisions.
(3) Before issuing such a code, the Regulator must consult such persons as appear to him to represent the views of persons engaged in the provision of regulated claims management services, and such other organisations, as he considers appropriate.
(b) in printed form.
(7) A code of practice issued under paragraph (1) has effect only from the date on which it is published in accordance with sub-paragraph (6)(a).
(b) the re-doing, without charge to the aggrieved person, of work improperly done; or (c) in a case in which the failure consists of the charging of an unjustifiable fee, the refund of all or part of the fee.
(3) For the purposes of paragraph (2)(c), a fee is unjustifiable if it should not have been charged.
(b) must give the authorised person a reasonable opportunity to make submissions in relation to the proposed direction; and (c) must take any such submission into account in deciding whether to give the direction.
Review by the Regulator of complaint handling 28. —(1) If—
(b) an authorised person and a client cannot agree on how to resolve a complaint by the client that the authorised person has failed to comply with the rules or a code of practice;
either the client or the authorised person may ask the Regulator to review the authorised person's handling of the complaint.
(b) the authorised person should alter its claims management procedures.
(2) The Regulator may give the authorised person a direction about the further handling of the complaint.
(b) must give the authorised person a reasonable opportunity to make submissions in relation to the proposed direction; and (c) must take any such submission into account in deciding whether to give the direction.
Routine inspection of records 30. —(1) The Regulator may, at a reasonable time and on reasonable notice, inspect the records of an authorised person for the purposes of assessing the authorised person's compliance with the conditions of authorisation. (2) Nothing in this regulation requires an authorised person to produce, or authorises the Regulator to require an authorised person to produce, any document or thing that is an item subject to legal privilege (as defined in section 10 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984[3]). Definitions for this Part 31. In this Part—
(b) a Circuit judge; or (c) a justice of the peace[4];
Investigation of offences against section 4(1) of Act: requirement to provide information 32. —(1) Before requiring a person to provide information or documents for the purpose of investigating whether a person has contravened section 4(1) of the Act, the Regulator must consider whether investigation is justified. (2) If an allegation of such a contravention has been made, the Regulator must consider whether the allegation—
(b) taken with any information offered by the complainant in support of it, is sufficiently detailed and specific for an investigation to be practicable.
(3) In all cases the Regulator must take into account—
(b) anything else in the Regulator's records that is relevant (for example, anything that tends to establish a pattern of allegations against, or apparent contraventions by, the person).
(4) For the purposes of paragraph (3)(a), the Regulator may consider material in, or the result of, an application or a request for exemption even if the application was for authorisation to provide, or the exemption was sought in relation to, another kind of regulated claims management service than that in relation to which the contravention is alleged or suspected to have occurred.
(b) is otherwise likely to be able to provide information relevant to the investigation of the alleged or suspected contravention.
(2) Such a requirement must be by notice in writing.
(b) must specify the place at which, and the period within which, the information or documents are to be given to the Regulator; and (c) may specify the form in which the information or a document is to be given.
(4) If such a notice specifies that information or a document is to be given in a particular form, the notice has not been complied with until the information or document is given in that form.
(b) the Regulator is satisfied that, because of exceptional circumstances, it is reasonable to allow the extra time.
(7) Nothing in this regulation authorises a search of any premises.
(b) paragraph (2), (3) or (5) applies in the particular case.
(2) This paragraph applies if there is reason to believe that if the Regulator were to require, under regulation 33, to be given the information or documents, the information or documents would be removed, tampered with or destroyed.
(b) there are further documents relevant to the investigation; and (c) if the Regulator were to require, under regulation 33, to be given the further documents, they would be removed, tampered with or destroyed.
Regulator to investigate complaints or suspicions of unprofessional conduct 35. —(1) If a person complains to the Regulator about the professional conduct of an authorised person, the Regulator may investigate the complaint. (2) The Regulator may also investigate the professional conduct of an authorised person if the Regulator is satisfied, otherwise than as a result of a complaint, that—
(b) the alleged or suspected breach is serious enough to justify investigation.
(3) In making the decision whether or not to investigate, the Regulator must take into account—
(b) if the grounds for the suspicion are not an allegation or allegations against the person, what those grounds are and the credibility of their source; (c) whether the person also engages in another business activity and, if so, what that activity is and its relationship to the business of the provision of claims management services; (d) whether there have been other credible allegations against, or suspicions about, the person of failure to comply with a condition of authorisation; (e) anything in the Regulator's records about the person that is relevant to the person's conduct as an authorised person, including, in particular—
(ii) any statements by the person under regulation 12(5)(f) to the effect that he has complied with conditions of the authorisation; (iii) any audit and inspection reports held by the Regulator; and (iv) any previous allegations against, or suspicions about, the person that the Regulator reasonably considers to have been well founded, even if no action was taken against the person;
(f) any report in the media;
Breaches by authorised persons of condition: requirement to provide information etc
(b) must specify the place at which, and the period within which, the information or documents are to be given to the Regulator; and (c) may specify the form in which the information or a document is to be given.
(4) If such a notice specifies that information or a document is to be given in a particular form, it has not been complied with until the information or document is given in that form.
(b) the Regulator is satisfied that, in the circumstances, it is reasonable to allow the extra time.
(7) Nothing in this regulation authorises a search of any premises.
(b) information or documents relevant, and of substantial value, to the investigation of the apparent failure are likely to be found at the premises.
(2) The Regulator may apply to a judicial officer for a search warrant to authorise a search of premises if—
(ii) information or documents relevant, and of substantial value, to the investigation of the apparent failure are likely to be found at the premises; and
(b) paragraph (3) or (5) applies in the particular case.
(3) This paragraph applies if—
(b) the authorised person has not done so within the period permitted by the requirement.
(4) An application for a search warrant in relation to which paragraph (3) applies must set out the steps taken to require the person to provide information or documents under regulation 36, and the person's response, if any.
(b) assessing compliance with a condition or conditions of an authorisation.
Definitions 38. —(1) In this Chapter—
(2) In this Chapter, a reference to an officer of the Regulator is a reference to an officer of the Regulator authorised in writing by the Regulator for the purposes of section 8(7) of, or paragraph 14(5) of the Schedule to, the Act.
(ii) whether the application is made under this Part or under section 8(5) of the Act; and
(b) specify in the application—
(ii) so far as is practicable, the material to be sought.
(3) An application is to be made ex parte and supported by an information in writing.
(b) that the material to be sought does not consist of or include—
(ii) excluded material; or (iii) special procedure material; and
(c) that at least one of the conditions set out in paragraph (2) applies in relation to each set of premises.
(2) The conditions referred to in paragraph (1)(c) are—
(b) that it is practicable to communicate with a person entitled to grant entry to the premises, but it is not practicable to communicate with any person entitled to grant access to the material; (c) that entry to the premises will not be granted unless a warrant is produced; (d) that the purpose of a search may be frustrated or seriously prejudiced unless an officer of the Regulator arriving at the premises can secure immediate entry to them.
(3) A judicial officer must not issue a warrant in response to an application unless he is satisfied that no judicial officer has refused to issue a warrant based on another application that is in substance the same.
(ii) the date on which it was issued;
(b) must specify each set of premises to be searched;
(2) The appropriate number of copies of the warrant must be made.
(b) in the case of a warrant that specifies two or more sets of premises, one more than the number of sets of premises specified.
(4) The copies must be clearly certified as copies.
(b) must show the warrant to the occupier; and (c) must give the occupier a copy of it.
(8) If the occupier of such premises is not present when an officer of the Regulator seeks to execute a warrant, but a person who appears to the officer to be in charge of the premises is present, paragraph (7) has effect as if each reference to the occupier were a reference to that other person.
(b) whether anything was copied.
(11) In the case of a warrant that authorises entry to and search of two or more sets of premises, the officer of the Regulator who executes the warrant—
(b) must specify in each endorsement the premises to which it relates.
Copying of documents
(b) in which it is visible and legible, or from which it can readily be produced in a visible and legible form;
if he has reasonable grounds for believing that it is a record for which the warrant authorises a search.
(b) excluded material; or (c) special procedure material.
Record to be given of records copied
(b) a person shows himself—
(ii) to have had custody or control of it; and
(c) the person asks the officer to give him a record of what was copied;
the officer must do so within a reasonable time.
(b) if the investigation is in relation to an alleged or suspected failure to comply with a condition of authorisation, before the Tribunal in proceedings in relation to the failure.
Cancellation etc of authorisations 46. —(1) Paragraph (2) applies if, after investigation of an alleged or suspected failure by an authorised person to comply with a condition of authorisation, the Regulator is satisfied that—
(b) cancellation, suspension or variation of the person's authorisation is appropriate.
(2) The Regulator may—
(b) vary the authorisation by limiting the classes of claims management services that the person may undertake or provide, or otherwise varying the conditions of the authorisation (including by imposing an additional condition).
(3) The cancellation of, or the proposed suspension or variation of, the person's authorisation is appropriate for the purposes of paragraph (1)(b) only if the nature and seriousness of the person's failure to comply with the condition is such that, to protect the public, it is necessary to cancel the authorisation, suspend it for the proposed period or vary it in the proposed way, as the case may be.
(b) in the case of suspension or variation, setting out the terms of the proposed suspension or variation; (c) setting out the reasons for the Regulator's decision, and a summary of the evidence on which the Regulator relies; (d) inviting the person to make a written submission in relation to the proposed cancellation, suspension or variation; and (e) specifying a reasonable period within which the person must do so.
(5) Before cancelling, suspending or varying the authorisation, the Regulator must take into account any submission made by the authorised person within the period allowed (or any further period allowed by the Regulator).
(b) either—
(ii) if it is sent or served in any other way, the day it is actually received by the authorised person.[8]
(This note is not part of the Regulations) The Regulations are made under the Compensation Act 2006 [9] (the Act). Under the Act, "regulated claims management service" means a claims management service of a kind prescribed by order by the Secretary of State[10], and "claims management services" include services in relation to claims for compensation, restitution, repayment or any other remedy or relief in respect of loss or damage, or in respect of an obligation. Part 1 of the Regulations provides for preliminary matters such as definitions. Part 2 of the Regulations makes provision about waiver, by the Regulator appointed under the Act, of the requirement for a person who provides regulated claims management services to be authorised. Such a waiver will be granted to a person only if the Regulator is satisfied that the Secretary of State intends to exempt the person from that requirement under section 6 of the Act, and only for a maximum period of six months. A waiver cannot be renewed. Members of certain professions whose professional conduct is already regulated (in particular, barristers, solicitors and legal executives), and certain other classes of person that are regulated in other ways, will be exempted from Part 2 of the Act by order by the Secretary of State. Certain persons or bodies that provide regulated claims management services on a not-for-profit basis will also be exempted. Part 3 of the Regulations deals with applications for authorisation to provide regulated claims management services. Part 4 of the Regulations authorises the Regulator to prescribe fees for application for and grant of authorisations and the renewal of authorisations. The fees must be approved by the Secretary of State. The Act requires the regulations to require the Regulator to prescribe rules, and to authorise the Regulator to issue a code or codes of practice, with which authorised persons must comply (see paragraph 8 of the Schedule to the Act). Part 6 of the Regulations sets out the requirements for those rules and codes of practice. Part 7 of the Regulations sets out the scheme for review by the Regulator of an authorised person's handling of complaints. The Regulator may review the authorised person's records and may give the authorised person directions about the future handling of the complaint or of complaints generally. Part 8 of the Regulations provides for the Regulator to audit an authorised person's records, at a reasonable time and on reasonable notice. The authorised person is however not obliged to show the Regulator anything that is an item subject to legal privilege, as defined in the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984. Part 9 of the Regulations provides for enforcement. It deals with the investigation of allegations or suspicion that a person has breached section 4 of the Act. A person who provides a regulated claims management service commits an offence under section 4 of the Act unless he is authorised under Part 2 to provide the service, is exempt under that Part or has the benefit of a waiver of the requirement to be authorised. If a person is alleged or suspected to have breached section 4 of the Act, the Regulator may require a person to provide information or documents to enable the Regulator to investigate the allegation. Chapter 3 of Part 9 deals with the investigation of allegations or suspicion that authorised persons have failed to comply with conditions of authorisation. It also provides for circumstances in which the Regulator may apply to a Judge of the High Court, Circuit judge or justice of the peace for a search warrant. Chapter 4 of Part 9 deals with search warrants generally. Regulations 39 to 45 are intended to reproduce, as nearly as possible and as far as applicable, the effect of sections 8 to 22 (except sections 17 and 18, which are not relevant) of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, which deal generally with the issue and execution of search warrants. A Regulator's officer applying for or executing a warrant is required to have regard to the codes issued by the Home Secretary under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 for searches of premises. Note that there is no power to seize documents. Part 10 deals with suspension and cancellation of an authorisation. An authorised person whose authorisation is cancelled, suspended or varied has the right of appeal to the Claims Management Services Tribunal and to the Court of Appeal. Notes: [1] 2006 c. 29.back [2] The procedure is set out in regulations 22 and 24 respectively.back [4] A District Judge (Magistrates' Courts) is by virtue of his or her office a justice of the peace—see s 25 of the Courts Act 2003 (2003 c. 39).back [6] 1984 c. 60. Section 66 amended by the Criminal Justice and Court Services Act 2000 (c. 43), ss 57(1), (4); and the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 (c. 15), ss 110(3)(a), 110(3)(b), 174(2) and Sch 17, Pt 2back [8] The Tribunal has the power to suspend the operation of the Regulator's decision—see the Act, s 11(4).back [10] See the Compensation (Regulated Claims Management Services) Order 2006, SI 2006/….back
ISBN 0 11 075497 2
|
|
| ||
| We welcome your comments on this site | © Crown copyright 2006 | Prepared 20 December 2006 |