Office of Public Sector Information
36.Section 54 creates a presumption that, if defendants fail to attend for trial without good cause, magistrates will use their powers to try them in their absence and sentence them if convicted.
37.Section 55 extends the range of hearings and proceedings in magistrates’ courts where the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) may be represented by a non -lawyer known as an Associate Prosecutor (formerly designated caseworker) rather than a Crown Prosecutor.
38.Sections 56 to 58 amend the criminal legal aid provisions in the Access to Justice Act 1999 to allow the right to representation to be applied for and granted provisionally before the point of charge; allow HMCS staff processing means tested applications to access Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) and DWP records for the purposes of assessing financial eligibility; and widen the powers to pilot schemes relating to the grant of legal aid.
39.Section 59 extends the existing powers of the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) in section 2 of the Criminal Justice Act 1987 to the vetting stage in any case involving bribery or corruption of overseas officials.
40.Section 60 amends the defence statement requirements in the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 to require defendants to set out not only the factual matters on which they take issue with the prosecution but also particulars of any other factual matters on which they intend to rely. Section 11 of the 1996 Act is amended to provide for the usual sanctions (comment and inferences) to be available for breach of these requirements
41.Section 61 alters the scheme, provided for in section 133 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 (the 1988 Act), for the award of compensation for miscarriages of justice. The changes impose a time limit for making applications for compensation, place upper limits on the amount of compensation that may be awarded, restrict the compensation that may be paid for loss of earnings, and enable the Assessor to make deductions from the total level of compensation in the light of any contributory conduct or any previous convictions held by the applicant.
42.Section 62 repeals section 8 of the Criminal Justice (Terrorism and Conspiracy) Act 1998 which requires the Secretary of State to lay before Parliament an annual report on the workings of that Act.
43.Sections 63 to 67 make it an offence to possess pornographic images that depict acts which threaten a person’s life, acts which result in or are likely to result in serious injury to a person’s anus, breasts or genitals, bestiality or necrophilia; they also provide for the exclusion of classified films etc. and set out defences and the penalties for the offence. Section 68 and Schedule 14 are intended to ensure that the operation of the extreme pornography offence is consistent with the UK’s commitments under the E-Commerce Directive (Directive 2000/31/EC) with regard to services provided by the Internet industry.
44.Sections 69 and 70 extend the definition of an indecent photograph in the Protection of Children Act 1978 (and the equivalent Northern Ireland legislation) to include a tracing or other image derived from a photograph.
45.Section 71 increases the maximum penalty for publication of obscene material and for the possession of such material for gain under the Obscene Publications Act 1959.
46.Section 72 substitutes a new section 72 into the Sexual Offences Act 2003 which allows for the prosecution of sexual offences against children committed abroad. In respect of the prosecution of UK nationals, it removes the requirement that the act committed must have been illegal in the country where it took place. This requirement remains for the prosecution of UK residents. For both nationals and residents this section provides that extra-territorial jurisdiction will apply for the offences specified where they are committed against children under 18, whereas currently it applies only to offences against children under 16. This section will support signature and ratification of the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of Children Against Sexual Exploitation and Abuse.
47.Section 73 introduces Schedule 15 which amends the offence of meeting a child following sexual grooming. Currently it is an offence if, following two earlier communications, an adult over 18 travels to meet a child under 16, with the intention of committing a sexual offence against that child. As a result of the amendment made by this Schedule an offence will be committed by an adult who has arranged a meeting with a child following two earlier communications, when the child travels to meet the offender. It also makes it an offence for an adult over 18 to arrange a meeting with a child under 16, following two earlier communications, if he intends to commit a sexual offence against that child during or after the meeting. Schedule 15 also amends the Sexual Offences Act 2003 and the Adoption Act 1976 as regards sexual offences and adoption.
48.Section 74 and Schedule 16 extend the offences of inciting hatred against people on religious grounds to cover hatred against people on grounds of sexual orientation.
49.Section 75 and Schedule 17 amend the Nuclear Material (Offences) Act 1983 (the 1983 Act) and the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 in order to give effect to amendments made in 2005 to the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material. The amendments made to the 1983 Act create a number of new criminal offences, including offences relating to damage to the environment and to the importation and exportation of nuclear material.
50.Section 76 clarifies the law on the use of force in self-defence or the prevention of crime.
51.Section 77 confers a power on the Secretary of State to make an order altering the maximum penalty for an offence under section 55 of the Data Protection Act 1998.
52.Section 78 inserts a new defence into section 55 of the Data Protection Act 1998. The defence applies when a person acts for journalistic, literary or artistic purposes with a view to the publication of journalistic, literary or artistic material and in the reasonable belief that their actions were justified as being in the public interest.
53.Section 79 abolishes the common law offences of blasphemy and blasphemous libel in England and Wales.
54.Sections 80 to 92 and Schedules 18 and 19 give effect to the European Council Framework Decision on the mutual recognition of financial penalties in England and Wales and Northern Ireland. Section 80 (or 82 in respect of Northern Ireland) provides for the submission by the Lord Chancellor to another member State of a certificate requesting enforcement of a financial penalty incurred by an offender who is normally resident or who has property or income in that other member State. Section 84 (or 87 in respect of Northern Ireland) provides for the receipt, by the Lord Chancellor, from another member State of like certificates requesting the enforcement of a financial penalty incurred by an offender in that other State who is normally resident or who has property or income in one of the jurisdictions in this country and for the transmission of such a certificate to a magistrates’ court. Section 85 (or 88 in Northern Ireland) and Schedule 18 set out the procedure for a magistrates’ court to validate such incoming requests and the grounds for refusal of such requests.
55.Sections 93 to 96 amend the Repatriation of Prisoners Act 1984 to enable the United Kingdom to ratify the Additional Protocol to the Council of Europe Convention on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons. The Protocol provides for the transfer of prisoners without their consent where the prisoner is to be deported at the end of the sentence or where a prisoner has fled from one jurisdiction to another in order to avoid imprisonment. Subject to the extension of section 44 of the Police and Justice Act 2006 to Scotland (section 96), sufficient legislation is already in place to deal with the transfer of those prisoners subject to deportation, but further legislation is required to deal with prisoners who have fled. Sections 94 and 95 create a procedure for the transfer of responsibility for the enforcement of a sentence of a prisoner who has fled from one jurisdiction to another. Section 93 extends the scope of the Repatriation of Prisoners Act 1984 to enable a British escort to deliver a prisoner to a point of arrival in the receiving country, extending the flexibility of the current arrangements.
56.Section 97 amends the Crime (International Co-operation) Act 2003 so that the Treasury may provide for functions conferred on the Secretary of State in relation to requests mutual legal assistance from overseas authorities may be exercisable instead by HMRC in relation to direct tax matters.
57.Part 7 (sections 98 to 117) makes provision for a new civil preventative order – the violent offender order (VOO). It sets out the qualifying offences which may trigger an application for a VOO; the procedure in respect of applications for and the making, variation, renewal or discharge of a VOO; provides an exhaustive list of the kinds of conditions which can be imposed as part of a violent offender order or interim violent offender order; makes provision for interim orders and appeals; provides for breach of an order or interim order to be a criminal offence throughout the United Kingdom; sets out requirements on persons subject to a VOO to notify the police of certain personal information and of changes to such information; provides for a failure to comply with the notification requirements to be a criminal offence throughout the United Kingdom; and provides for the police and others to provide information to the Secretary of State for the purposes of verifying the information supplied in pursuance of the notification requirements.
58.Section 118 and Schedule 20 introduce powers for the courts to close, on a temporary basis, premises associated with significant and persistent disorder or persistent serious nuisance to members of the public. They set out the procedure for the issue of closure notices by the police and local authorities and for the making of applications for closure orders; and make provision for the enforcement (including by making breach of an order a criminal offence), extension and discharge of closure orders and for appeals against the grant or refusal of an order. Practitioners considering applying for a closure order under these provisions where there has been persistent disorder or nuisance would be required to consider any statutory guidance issued by the Secretary of State.
59.Sections 119 to 122 and Schedule 21 create a new offence of causing nuisance or disturbance on NHS premises in England and Wales (and HSS premises in Northern Ireland) and confer powers on a constable or an authorised member of NHS staff to remove a person reasonably suspected of committing the offence from the premises concerned. Provision is made for the Secretary of State (or Welsh Ministers in respect of hospital premises in Wales) to issue guidance on the exercise, by NHS staff, of the removal powers.
60.Section 123 provides for the annual review of Anti-Social Behaviour Orders, including orders made under section 1B or 1C of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 (ASBOs) made against a child or young person under the age of 17. Section 124 requires a court to consider making an individual support order in all cases where an ASBO is made in respect of a child or young person.
61.Section 125 extends the list of local authorities in England which may enter into a parenting contract or apply for a parenting order.
62.Sections 126 and 127 and Schedules 22 and 23 amend the procedures for dealing with matters in respect of the conduct and performance of police officers and special constables and in respect of the investigation of complaints and incidents of police misconduct.
63.Section 128 amends section 57 of the Police Act 1996 to amplify the powers of the Secretary of State to provide financial assistance to organisations which promote the efficiency or effectiveness of the police.
64.Section 129 extends the functions of Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC) so that it may inspect the full range of police authority functions or any particular function.
65.Part 10 (sections 130 to 137) makes provision for a new immigration status for designated foreign nationals who have committed terrorism or other serious criminal offences and who cannot currently be removed from the UK because of the operation of section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998. Provision is made as to the effect of a designation on a person’s immigration status, the conditions that may be imposed on a person so designated, appeals and support.
66.Section 138 reintroduces a statutory prohibition on the inducement of industrial action or breaches of discipline by prison officers in England and Wales and Scotland. Industrial action is defined for the purposes of section 127 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 as “the withholding of services as a prison officer” or “any action that would be likely to put at risk the safety of any person”. Section 139 also provides a power for the Secretary of State to suspend or later revive the operation of the statutory prohibition by order.
67.Section 140 and Schedule 24 place a duty on MAPPA authorities (police, prison and probation services) to consider, in each case, disclosure to members of the public of information in its possession relating to the convictions of any child sex offender being managed by it.
68.Section 141 amends the criteria necessary for Sexual Offences Prevention Orders to be made.
69.Section 142 amends the Sexual Offences Act 2003 in order to allow the Secretary of State to add, through secondary legislation, to the notification requirements placed on those convicted or cautioned of relevant sexual offences or otherwise subject to the sex offender notification requirements.
70.Section 143 enables a magistrates’ court to impose a restricted premises order or a restricted sales order on those who have persistently sold tobacco to under 18s.
71.Section 144 inserts new sections 55A to 55E into the Data Protection Act 1998. These new sections create a framework for the Information Commissioner to serve a monetary penalty notice on a data controller.
72.Section 145 gives effect to Schedule 25, which makes changes to armed forces legislation similar to certain provisions of the Act.
73.Section 146 provides that the Secretary of State does not have to deport a person automatically where he thinks this would be contrary to the United Kingdom’s obligations under the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings.
74.Part 12 (sections 147 to 154 and Schedules 26 to 28) deals with the making of orders and regulations under the Act, contains consequential amendments and repeals of existing legislation, and provides for the commencement and extent of the Act.
75.In September 2003, the Government published “Youth Justice – the next steps” (available at www.homeoffice.gov.uk/documents/cons-youth-justice-next-steps/) a companion document to the Green Paper “Every Child Matters”. This paper set out possible reforms to the Youth Justice System. A summary of the responses to this consultation together with the Government’s response was published in March 2004 (available at www.homeoffice.gov.uk/documents/cons-youth-jus-next-steps-summ/). Part 1 of the Act gives effect to the proposals to create a YRO.
76.Section 9 gives effect to the proposal to set out the purpose of juvenile sentencing which was set out in “Youth Justice – the next steps”.
77.In May 2007 the Government published “Penal Policy - a background paper” (available at http://www.justice.gov.uk/penalpolicy.htm). The paper set out the Government’s commitment to use prison and probation resources to best effect to protect the public, punish the offender and reduce re-offending. The paper set out new arrangements for the recall of non-dangerous offenders who breach the terms of their licence. Sections 29 and 30 give effect to these provisions.
78.In December 2007, Lord Carter published his Review of Prisons: Securing the Future (available at www.justice.gov.uk/publications/securing_the_future.htm) Sections 11, 13-18, 21-23, 25-26, 28, 51 and 52 give effect to certain recommendations to manage the use of custody.
79.Concerns were expressed in recent judgments of the Court of Appeal, and in the response of the senior judiciary to the consultation paper “Quashing convictions” (available at www.cjsonline.gov.uk/downloads/application/pdf/quashing_convictions_consult.pdf), about cases where the Court of Appeal had found itself obliged to quash convictions that were valid according to the law at the time of the trial. The problem had arisen where an appeal turned on a development in the law since the date of conviction and the case had been referred by the CCRC. The Court’s usual practice is to refuse an extension of time in which to appeal in “change of law” cases, but that solution is not available in cases referred by the CCRC since they are not subject to a leave requirement. Sections 42 and 43 respond to these concerns.
80.The Home Office issued a consultation on extending the ambit of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 to cautions in 1999 (available at www.homeoffice.gov.uk/documents/cons-1999-rehab-offenders). Section 49 amends the 1974 Act to this end.
81.The Home Office consultation “Reform of the Prevention of Corruption Acts and SFO Powers in Cases of Bribery of Foreign Officials,” published in December 2005, included a proposal to extend investigatory powers (under section 2 of the Criminal Justice Act 1987) of the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) to the vetting stage in cases involving allegations of bribery or corruption of overseas officials. The consultation paper and the Government’s response are available at www.homeoffice.gov.uk/documents/cons-2005-bribery/. Section 59 gives effect to this proposal.
82.In a Written Ministerial Statement in April 1996 the then Home Secretary announced a number of changes to the way in which applications for compensation following a miscarriage of justice were handled. Section 61 of this Act gives effect to the legislative proposals announced in April 2006 and the changes impact mainly on the way in which the amount of compensation is assessed by the independent Assessor.
83.Section 8 of the Criminal Justice (Terrorism and Conspiracy) Act 1998 requires the Secretary of State to lay before Parliament at least once every year a report on the working of the Act. The terrorism provisions (in sections 1-4) of that Act have been repealed and incorporated in the Terrorism Act 2000 leaving only the conspiracy provisions (in sections 5-7) under which agreements to commit acts that are criminal offences in a foreign jurisdiction can be tried as criminal conspiracies in the UK. The conspiracy provisions have been used in a small number of cases and deemed to fulfil their intended purpose satisfactorily but successive reviewers have concluded that annual review of these provisions adds nothing of real value to the scrutiny through the judicial process of the working of the Act. On 10 December 2002 the then Home Secretary (David Blunkett) announced in a written statement (Hansard, column 12WS-14WS) that, on the recommendation of the then reviewer (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC), the requirement to conduct an annual review would be abolished when a legislative opportunity occurred. Section 62 gives effect to this decision.
84.A joint Home Office/Scottish Executive consultation on extreme pornographic material was published in August 2005. A summary of the responses to this consultation together with the Government’s response was published in August 2006 (available at www.homeoffice.gov.uk/documents/cons-extreme-porn-3008051/). Sections 63 to 67 give effect to these proposals.
85.The offences introduced by section 75 and Schedule 17 are needed in order to facilitate UK ratification of amendments made in 2005 to the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material (CPPNM). The original CPPNM was concluded under the auspices of the International Atomic Energy Agency in 1980. It entered into force in 1987, and there are currently 130 Parties. The UK is a Party, having signed the Convention in 1980 and ratified it in 1991.
86.A joint Crown Prosecution Service/Association of Chief Police Officers leaflet was published in February 2005 (available at www.cps.gov.uk/Publications/docs/intruder_leaflet2005.pdf). This aimed to set out in plain language what householders’ rights are and the level of force they can use when confronted by an intruder. In September 2007 the Justice Secretary announced the Government’s intention to review the law on self-defence to address the issue of public understanding, which is still apparent. Section 76 clarifies the law on the use of force in self-defence or the prevention of crime.
87.The provisions (in section 77) to amend the Data Protection Act 1998 to allow for custodial sanctions for those convicted of offences under section 55 of that Act were set out in a consultation paper in July 2006 “Increasing penalties for deliberate and wilful misuse of personal data”. The Government’s response was published in February 2007. Both documents are available at www.dca.gov.uk/consult/misuse_data/cp0906.htm.
88.Sections 80 to 92 implement the Council Framework Decision on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to financial penalties (2005/214/JHA), which was adopted in 2005. The Framework Decision allows a financial penalty imposed on an offender in one European Union Member State to be transferred to another Member State for enforcement. Responsibility for the enforcement of financial penalties received from another Member State will rest with the magistrates’ court where the offender is located and its designated Fines Officer, in line with their responsibilities for enforcement of fines imposed domestically.
89.The Government announced its intention to introduce violent offender orders in “Rebalancing the criminal justice system in favour of the law-abiding majority” published in July 2006 (available at www.homeoffice.gov.uk/documents/CJS-review.pdf/CJS-review-english.pdf). A consultation paper was subsequently issued by the Home Office in April 2007 and a summary of the response published in June 2007 (“Stakeholder consultation on Violent Offender Orders: Summary of responses and next steps” available at www.homeoffice.gov.uk/documents/response-violent-offender.pdf).
90.The Government published its consultation paper “Strengthening powers to tackle anti-social behaviour” in November 2006 (available at www.homeoffice.gov.uk/documents/cons-asb-powers/). A summary of the responses to this consultation together with the Government’s response was published in May 2007 and is available at www.homeoffice.gov.uk/documents/response-asb-powers?version=1. Section 118 gives effect to the proposals to introduce premises closure orders.
91.The Department of Health published a consultation paper “Tackling nuisance or disturbance behaviour on NHS healthcare premises in June 2006 (available at www.dh.gov.uk/Consultations/ClosedConsultations/ClosedConsultationsArticle/fs/en?CONTENT_ID=4138711&chk=mE2N5d). The consultation document proposed new powers for NHS health bodies to deal with individuals causing a nuisance or disturbance on NHS premises. A summary of the responses to this consultation together with the Government’s response was published in November 2006 (available at www.dh.gov.uk/Consultations/ResponsesToConsultations/ResponsesToConsultationsDocumentSummary/fs/en?CONTENT_ID=4140248&chk=Z%2B9but). Sections 119 to 121 give effect to these proposals.
92.A fundamental review of the police officer disciplinary arrangements was published in January 2005. The report is available at press.homeoffice.gov.uk/documents/police-disciplinary-arrangements/. Sections 126 to 127 and Schedules 22 and 23 give effect to those recommendations which require primary legislation.
93.Part 10 gives effect to the Home Secretary’s commitment to legislate to deny leave to enter or remain to certain foreign nationals who can not be removed from the UK compatibly with the United Kingdom’s obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The commitment was made following the judgment of the Court of Appeal in S and others vs Secretary of State for the Home Department in August 2006.
94.Section 127 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 enabled the Secretary of State (or in Scotland, Scottish Ministers) to bring an action against any person who causes loss or damage by inducing a prison officer to withhold his services as such an officer or to commit a breach of discipline. It also enabled actions to be brought where there was an anticipated contravention of the section. The effect of the Regulatory Reform (Prison Officers) (Industrial Action) Order 2005 (the 2005 Order) was that section 127 no longer applied in relation to such an inducement in respect of a prison officer in England and Wales, or in Scotland, although it continued to apply in respect of prison officers in Northern Ireland as well as custody officers in private sector prisons.
95.The 2005 Order followed the signing of the Joint Industrial Relations Partnership Agreement (JIRPA) between the Prison Service and POA which included an express undertaking by the POA not to “induce, authorise or support any form of industrial action by any of its members employed in the Prison Service relating to a dispute concerning any matter, whether covered by this agreement or otherwise”. A similar Voluntary Agreement was signed by the Scottish Prison Service and POA. The POA subsequently gave notice of their withdrawal from the JIRPA which expired on 8 May 2008. The POA in Scotland has not withdrawn from their equivalent agreement.
96.Section 138 reintroduces a statutory prohibition on inducing prison officers in England and Wales and Scotland to take industrial action or commit a breach of discipline.
97.The “Review of the Protection of Children from Sex Offenders” was commissioned by the Home Secretary in June 2006 and was published in June 2007 (available at www.homeoffice.gov.uk/documents/CSOR/chid-sex-offender-review-130607?view=Binary). Sections 140 to 142 give effect to some of the recommendations of the review.
98.In the 2004 Choosing Health White Paper, the Government signalled its intention to introduce preventative orders to deal more effectively with those who repeatedly sell tobacco products to under-age children. The implementation of the scheme was the subject of public consultation in July. A summary of the responses to this consultation together with the Government’s response was published in February 2007 (available at www.dh.gov.uk/en/Consultations/Responsestoconsultations/DH_065350). Section 143 gives effect to the scheme.
99.The Home Secretary announced in January 2008 the Government’s intention to ratify the Council of Europe Convention against trafficking during 2008. A copy of the Convention is available at http://www.coe.int/t/dg2/trafficking/campaign/Source/PDF_Conv_197_Trafficking_E.pdf. Section 146 ensures that the UK can comply with the Convention once it has been ratified.
100.In the main the Act’s provisions extend to England and Wales only, but certain provisions also extend to Scotland or Northern Ireland, or both. In relation to Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, the Act addresses both devolved and non-devolved matters.
101.The provisions of the Act relating to the following reserved matters extend to Scotland:
the new offences relating to nuclear material and nuclear facilities together with the other related amendments to the 1983 Act and the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 (section 75 and Schedule 17);
the power of the Secretary of State to make an order altering the maximum penalty for unlawfully obtaining etc. personal data (section 77) and the new defence in respect of an offence under section 55 of the Data Protection Act 1998 (section 78);
the amendments to the Ministry of Defence Police Act 1987 and the Railways and Transport Safety Act 2003 in relation to the misconduct and performance procedures for Ministry of Defence Police and British Transport Police officers (Parts 2 and 3 of Schedule 22);
the new special immigration status for certain foreign nationals (Part 10);
industrial action by prison officers (sections 138 and 139);
power to require data controllers to pay monetary penalty (section 144); and
the amendments to the UK Borders Act 2007 in relation to trafficking (section 146).
102.The Scottish Parliament’s consent was sought for the provisions in the Act that trigger the Sewel Convention. These provisions relate to sections 59 (SFO’s pre-investigatory powers in relation to bribery and corruption), 93 to 96 (repatriation of prisoners) and 113 (offences in respect of VOOs). The Sewel Convention provides that Westminster will not normally legislate with regard to devolved matters in Scotland without the consent of the Scottish Parliament. The consent was given on 30 January 2008. (see Official Report at www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/officialReports/meetingsParliament/or-08/sor0130-02.htm#Col5627.
103.The provisions of the Act relating to the following excepted or reserved matters also extend to Northern Ireland:
YROs to the extent that the provisions allow for such Orders made in England and Wales to be enforced in Northern Ireland and for certain orders made in Northern Ireland to be enforced by means of arrangements for YROs in England and Wales (section 3 and Schedule 3);
youth default orders, to the extent that the provisions allows for such orders made in England and Wales to be enforced in Northern Ireland (section 39)
the provisions relating to appeals and unduly lenient sentences (sections 43, 45, 46 and Part 2 of Schedule 8);
the amendments to the compensation for miscarriages of justice regime in the Criminal Justice Act 1998 (section 61);
the repeal of the requirement to undertake an annual review of the operation of Criminal Justice (Terrorism and Conspiracy) Act 1998 (section 62);
the new offence of possession of extreme pornographic material and amendment to the definition of an indecent photograph in the Protection of Children (Northern Ireland) Order 1998 (sections 63 to 68 and 70);
the new offences relating to nuclear material and nuclear facilities together with the other related amendments to the 1983 Act and the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 (section 75 and Schedule 17);
the clarification of the law on self defence (section 76);
the power of the Secretary of State to make an order altering the maximum penalty for unlawfully obtaining etc. personal data (section 77) and the new defence in respect of an offence under section 55 of the Data Protection Act 1998 (section 78);
the mutual recognition of financial penalties (sections 82, 83, 86 to 89, 90 and 92 and Schedules 18 and 19)
mutual legal assistance in respect of revenue matters (section 97);
the amendments to the Ministry of Defence Police Act 1987 in relation to the misconduct and performance procedures for Ministry of Defence Police officers (Part 2 of Schedule 22);
the new special immigration status for certain foreign nationals (Part 10);
industrial action by prison officers (sections 138 and 139); and
power to require data controllers to pay monetary penalty (section 144).
104.In addition, the Act contains provisions relating to one transferred matter, namely the new offence of causing nuisance or disturbance on HSS premises (section 122 and Schedule 21). These provisions extend to Northern Ireland only. The Northern Ireland Assembly agreed a Legislative Consent Motion in respect of these provisions on 3 December 2007 (see Official Report at http://www.niassembly.gov.uk/record/reports2007/071203.htm#3).
105.In relation to Wales, the subject matter of the Act has not been transferred except for:
YROs – to the extent that they draw on local authority or NHS services;
Premises closure orders – to the extent that they confer powers or duties on local authorities;
Nuisance or disturbance on NHS premises - to the extent they confer powers on NHS staff and
Review of ASBOs – to the extent that they impose powers or duties on local authorities.
106.Certain provisions of the Act extend, or may be extended, to the Channel Islands, Isle of Man etc. (see section 152(6) to (9)).
107.Section 1 and Schedule 1 provide for YROs. This is the new community sentence for offenders aged under 18. It combines several existing community sentences into one new generic community sentence. When imposing a YRO, the court will be able to choose from a “menu” of different requirements that the offender must comply with.
108.Subsection (1) provides that a YRO may impose on the offender one or more of the following requirements:
an activity requirement;
a supervision requirement;
if the offender is aged 16 or 17, an unpaid work requirement;
a programme requirement;
an attendance centre requirement;
a prohibited activity requirement;
a curfew requirement;
an exclusion requirement;
a residence requirement;
a local authority residence requirement;
a mental health treatment requirement;
a drug treatment requirement;
a drug testing requirement;
an intoxicating substance treatment requirement;
an education requirement.
109.Subsection (2) provides that a YRO may also impose an electronic monitoring requirement as described in paragraph 26 of Schedule 1. An electronic monitoring requirement must be imposed where a YRO imposes a curfew or exclusion requirement (paragraph 2of Schedule 1) unless in the particular circumstances of the case, the court is satisfied it would be inappropriate to do so or it is not practicable for the reasons set out in paragraph 26(3) or (6).
110.Subsections (3) and (4) and paragraphs 3 and 4 of Schedule 1 provide for a YRO with intensive supervision and surveillance and a YRO with fostering.
111.Subsection (4) provides that a court may not impose a YRO with intensive supervision and surveillance or a YRO with fostering unless the offence is punishable with imprisonment and the court is satisfied that the offence (on its own or with others) is so serious that, but for the availability of these orders, a custodial sentence would be appropriate (or where the offender is under 12, would be appropriate if the offender had been 12). For offenders under the age of 15, the court must be satisfied that they are persistent offenders.
112.Paragraph 3 of Schedule 1 provides that if the conditions in subsection (4) are met the order may impose an “extended activity requirement” (for a number of days between 90 and 180). An order containing such a requirement is “a YRO with intensive supervision and surveillance”. Such an order must also impose a supervision requirement, a curfew requirement and an electronic monitoring requirement (unless inappropriate or impracticable) and may also impose other requirements.
113.Paragraph 4 of Schedule 1 sets out additional conditions to those in subsection (4) of section 1 which must be met before a court can impose a YRO with fostering. The court has to be satisfied that the behaviour which constituted the offence was due to a significant extent to the circumstances in which the offender was living and that the imposition of such a requirement would assist in the offender’s rehabilitation. The court must also consult the local authority and (where practicable) the parents or guardians of the offender prior to imposing this requirement. A YRO with fostering must also impose a supervision requirement. The offender must be given the opportunity of legal representation (paragraph 19).
114.Subsection (6) of section 1 applies the restrictions which apply to other community sentences under sections 148 and 150 of the 2003 Act to the YRO. The effect is that a YRO must not be imposed on an offender unless the court considers the offence or offences serious enough to warrant it; that the requirements forming part of the YRO must be the most suitable for the offender and the restrictions on liberty imposed by the order must be commensurate with the seriousness of the offence. A YRO will not be available in a case where the penalty is fixed by law, such as murder, or where there is a mandatory custodial sentence.
115.Paragraph 5 of Schedule 1 provides that a YRO with intensive supervision and surveillance may not impose a fostering requirement. Paragraph 5 also provides that if the offender fails to comply with a pre-sentence drug testing order the court may impose a YRO with intensive supervision and surveillance. There is already existing provision in section 152(3)(b) of the 2003 Act which provides that if a juvenile or adult offender fails to comply with a pre-sentence drug testing order under section 161(2) of that Act, the court may pass a custodial sentence.
116.Part 2 of Schedule 1 makes detailed provision about the requirements which may be imposed in a YRO. They are largely self explanatory and not all details are repeated here. Paragraphs 6 to 8 deal with the activity requirement. An offender may be required to participate in specified activities including residential exercises. Other than where intensive supervision and surveillance is imposed, an activity requirement cannot be for more than a total of 90 days.
117.Paragraph 8(3) provides that the court may not include an activity requirement unless it has consulted a member of the youth offending team, or an officer of a local probation board or an officer of a provider of probation services and it is satisfied that it is feasible to secure compliance with the requirement. Paragraph 8(4) states that an activity requirement, which requires co-operation with anybody other than the offender and the responsible officer (defined in section 6 below) may only be included with that other person’s consent.
118.Paragraph 9 of Schedule 1 provides for a supervision requirement and reflects, with modifications, paragraph 2 of Schedule 6 to the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 (the 2000 Act). The offender may be required to attend appointments arranged by the responsible officer.
119.Paragraph 10 of Schedule 1 provides for an unpaid work requirement and is modelled on section 199 of the 2003 Act. An unpaid work requirement may be for between 40 and 240 hours and could include, for example, graffiti cleaning, community artwork or work to repair or improve community facilities. Unpaid work is currently available, for 16 and 17 year olds, as part of the community punishment order.
120.Paragraph 11 of Schedule 1 provides for a programme requirement. A programme requirement is a new requirement for juveniles and is designed to allow juvenile offenders to engage in programmes that will address their offending behaviour, teach life skills or other positive interventions. It is modelled on section 202 of the 2003 Act. Paragraph 11(1) defines a “programme requirement” as a requirement that the offender participates in a specified systematic set of activities, which may include a residential programme.
Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008