Section 27: Electro-convulsive therapy, etc

91. Section 27 inserts a new section 58A into the 1983 Act. That new section provides that ECT and any other treatment provided for by regulations made under subsection (1)(b), can only be given when the patient either gives consent, or is incapable of giving consent. This provision is subject to the provisions about emergency treatment in section 62 of the 1983 Act (as amended by section 28 of the 2007 Act). This is to ensure that a patient, including one who is not consenting, can still receive treatment in the urgent circumstances set out in section 62 if there is insufficient time to apply the requirements at section 58A.

92. Where a detained patient 18 years of age or older consents to treatment with ECT (or any other treatment provided for by regulations), that consent must be certified by either the AC in charge of the patient's treatment or a SOAD. Where a child patient under 18 years of age who is either a detained patient or an informal patient who is not subject to a CTO consents to such treatment, a SOAD must certify that consent and that it is appropriate for the treatment to be given.

93. Where a detained patient is incapable of consent, the SOAD must certify that the patient is not capable of understanding the nature, purpose and likely effects of the treatment and that it is appropriate for the patient to receive the treatment. Before doing so, the SOAD must first consult two other persons - one must be a nurse concerned with the patient's medical treatment and the second must be another person professionally concerned with the patient's medical treatment who is neither a nurse nor a doctor. The patient's RC (if they have one) and the person in charge of their treatment (if they are not the RC) are excluded from being a person the SOAD has a statutory duty to consult.

94. Where an informal child patient (who is not subject to a CTO) is incapable of consent and there is authority to treat such a patient, the SOAD must similarly certify that the patient is not capable of understanding the nature, purpose and likely effects of the treatment and that it is appropriate for the patient to receive the treatment. Before doing so, the SOAD must first consult two other persons - one must be a nurse concerned with the patient's medical treatment and the second must be another person professionally concerned with the patient's medical treatment who is neither a nurse nor a doctor. The person in charge of the patient's treatment is excluded from being a person the SOAD has a statutory duty to consult.

95. The SOAD is not able to give such a certificate if giving the treatment would conflict with:

• a valid and applicable advance decision of the patient not to receive the treatment as provided for by the Mental Capacity Act 2005, or

• a decision made by a deputy or donee as defined by the Mental Capacity Act 2005, where the deputy or donee has the authority to refuse such treatment on behalf of the patient, or

• an order of the Court of Protection.

96. Before making regulations regarding section 58A, the Secretary of State for England and the Welsh Ministers for Wales shall consult any such bodies as appear to them to be concerned.

Section 28: Section 27: supplemental

97. Section 28 of the 2007 Act amends section 62 of the 1983 Act (urgent treatment) so that, where the treatment is ECT, urgent treatment can only be given where it is immediately necessary to save life or to prevent a serious deterioration in the patient's condition. Where the treatment is another form of section 58A type treatment (to be determined by regulations under section 58A), the Secretary of State for England and the Welsh Ministers for Wales, may make regulations regarding which of the criteria in section 62(1) of the 1983 Act for urgent treatment are to apply to that treatment. Section 28 of the 2007 Act also makes consequential amendments to sections 58, 59, 60, 61, 62 and 63 of the 1983 Act, and to section 28 of the MCA, to take account of the new section 58A.

Section 29: Withdrawal of consent

98. Section 29 of the 2007 Act amends section 60 of the 1983 Act (withdrawal of consent), which sets out the effect on a certificate issued under Part 4 of the 1983 Act by either the approved clinician in charge of the treatment or a SOAD when the patient, having given consent, withdraws that consent. The amendment clarifies the position when a patient who has been certified as unable to understand the nature, purpose and likely effects of the treatment becomes able to so understand. It also clarifies the position when a person, having consented, loses the ability to understand the nature, purpose and likely effects of the treatment. In both cases the certificate is no longer valid.

Section 30: Independent Mental Health Advocates

99. Section 30 places a duty on the appropriate national authority to make arrangements for help to be provided by independent mental health advocates (IMHAs). IMHAs must be made available to certain "qualifying patients" subject to the powers or safeguards in the 1983 Act as amended, to provide support in the ways specified in the provisions.

100. Qualifying patients will be informed that they are eligible for the services provided by an IMHA as soon as is practicable. An IMHA will meet with a patient on the request of the patient, the nearest relative, the responsible clinician or an AMHP.

101. Where a patient has the capacity to consent and does so, an IMHA has a right to see any hospital or local authority records relating to him. If a patient lacks the capacity to consent, the record holder can still allow access to such records if it is appropriate and relevant to the help the advocate will provide to the patient. IMHAs have a right to meet patients in private and to visit and interview anyone professionally concerned with the patient's medical treatment.

102. The appropriate national authority can make regulations setting out, for example, the standards and qualifications that will need to be met by an individual in order to be approved as an IMHA. These regulations can make different provision for different cases. This will allow them to take account of the different needs of different groups of patients.

103. Section 30 also amends section 134 of the 1983 Act, to ensure that hospital managers cannot withhold correspondence between patients and their advocates.

Section 31: Accommodation etc

104. Section 31 adds new section 131A to the 1983 Act. This places hospital managers under a duty to ensure that patients aged under 18 admitted to hospital for mental disorder are accommodated in an environment that is suitable for their age (subject to their needs). In determining whether the environment is suitable, the managers must consult a person whom they consider to be suitable because of their experience in child and adolescent mental health services cases.

105. Section 31 also amends section 39 of the 1983 Act (information as to hospitals) to provide that a court may request information from a primary care trust (PCT) (in England) or local health board (LHB) (in Wales) when dealing with a person aged under 18 in certain cases. Those cases are where the court is minded to make a hospital order or interim hospital order, to remand the person to hospital for a report on their mental condition (section 35) or for treatment (section 36), or (in the case of a magistrates' court) to order detention in hospital when committing an offender to the crown court (section 44). The information will be about the availability of accommodation or facilities designed to be specially suitable for patients under 18. The purpose of this provision is to ensure that courts do not place a child in a prison setting when a suitable hospital bed would be a more appropriate option.

106. Section 31 also amends section 140 of the 1983 Act (notification of hospitals having arrangements for reception of urgent cases) to place a duty on PCTs and LHBs to advise local social service authorities in their area of hospitals providing accommodation specially suitable for patients aged under 18.

CHAPTER 4 - SUPERVISED COMMUNITY TREATMENT

Overview

107. The supervised community treatment (SCT) provisions will allow some patients with a mental disorder to live in the community whilst still being subject to powers under the 1983 Act. Only those patients who are detained in hospital for treatment will be eligible to be considered for SCT. In order for a patient to be placed on SCT, various criteria need to be met. An AMHP also needs to agree that SCT is appropriate. Patients who are on SCT will be subject to conditions whilst living in the community. Most conditions will depend on individual circumstances but must be for the purpose of ensuring the patient receives medical treatment, or to prevent risk of harm to the patient or others. Such conditions will form part of the patient's community treatment order (CTO) which is made by the RC. Patients on SCT may be recalled to hospital for treatment should this become necessary. Afterwards they may then resume living in the community or, if they need to be treated as an in-patient again, their RC may revoke the CTO and the patient will remain in hospital for the time being.

108. SCT differs from after-care under supervision, which it will replace, in that it will allow patients who do not need to continue receiving treatment in hospital to be discharged into the community, but with powers of recall to hospital if necessary. It is different from leave of absence under section 17 of the 1983 Act, which remains suitable for a patient as a means to give shorter term leave from hospital as part of the patient's overall management as a hospital patient.

Section 32: Community treatment orders, etc

109. Section 32 inserts new sections 17A-17G which set out how CTOs are to be made, and how they will work.

110. Under new section 17A, the RC may make a CTO for a patient detained under section 3, or for a patient who is not subject to restrictions under Part 3 of the 1983 Act (i.e. to a restriction order, a restriction direction or a limitation direction), if they are satisfied that the relevant criteria are met. An AMHP must agree that the criteria are met and also that a CTO is appropriate for that patient. The CTO, and the AMHP's agreement to it, will be in writing.

111. The criteria that the patient must meet - in order to be suitable for SCT - are specified within section 17A(5). The patient must need medical treatment for their mental disorder for their own health or safety, or for the protection of others. It must be possible for the patient to receive the treatment they need without having to be in hospital, provided that the patient can be recalled to hospital for treatment should this become necessary. When deciding if it is necessary to be able to recall the patient to hospital, the RC must consider the risk that the patient's condition will deteriorate after discharge from hospital, as a result, for example, of their refusing or neglecting to receive the treatment they need. In considering that risk, the RC must have regard to the patient's history of mental disorder and any other relevant factors. Appropriate medical treatment for the patient must be available in the community. Patients who are subject to a CTO are referred to in the legislation as "community patients".

112. Section 17B requires that CTOs specify conditions to which a community patient will be subject. There are two mandatory conditions that the patient must be available for medical examinations, firstly as required for the purposes of determining whether the CTO should be extended, and secondly to allow a SOAD to make a Part 4A certificate. Otherwise, conditions must be necessary or appropriate to ensure that the patient receives medical treatment, or to prevent harm to the patient's health or safety, or to protect others. The RC and an AMHP must agree the conditions. The RC may vary the conditions, or suspend any of them.

113. Other than the conditions about availability for examination, the conditions specified under section 17B are not in themselves enforceable but, if a patient fails to comply with any condition, the RC may take that into account when considering if it is necessary to use the recall power (section 17B(6)). However, if the criteria for recall are met, the recall power may still be exercised even if the patient is complying with the conditions (section 17B(7)). See also section 17E.

114. Section 17C specifies the duration of a CTO. A patient's CTO will end either if the period of the CTO runs out and the CTO is not extended, or the patient is discharged from the powers of the 1983 Act. It will also end if the RC revokes the CTO following the patient's recall to hospital under section 17F or, for Part 3 patients, if the CTO was time-specific and runs out.

115. Section 17D sets out the effect of a CTO on certain other provisions of the 1983 Act. The application for admission for treatment under which the patient was detained remains in force, but the hospital managers' authority to detain the patient under section 6(2) is suspended whilst the patient remains a community patient. The authority to detain the patient will not expire while it is suspended. However, when a patient's CTO ends, the patient will be discharged absolutely from SCT. Should an application for admission for treatment still remain in force, this will also end.

116. Section 17D(2)(b) provides that where the 1983 Act mentions patients who are "detained" or "liable to be detained", this does not include community patients. Where it is intended that a provision should apply to community patients, the 1983 Act is amended by the 2007 Act to make this clear. In addition, references in other legislation to patients who are detained, or liable to be detained, do not include community patients.

117. Section 17E provides that a community patient may be recalled to hospital if the RC decides that the patient needs to receive treatment for his or her mental disorder in a hospital and that, without this treatment, there would be a risk of harm to the patient's health or safety, or to other people. The recall notice will trigger the hospital managers' authority to re-detain the patient (section 17E(6)). A community patient may be recalled even if the patient is in hospital at the time. This could happen, for example, if the patient goes to hospital but then refuses the treatment that the RC considers is needed, and the patient, or someone else, would be at risk if the patient were not to receive that treatment.

118. Under section 17E(2), there is also a power to recall a patient to hospital if the patient fails to comply with the condition under section 17B(3) that specifies that patients must make themselves available for examination. This allows the RC to examine a patient to assess whether a patient's CTO should be extended and also allows a SOAD to examine the patient in order to meet the certificate requirement in new sections 64B and 64E of the 1983 Act (see section 35 below).

119. Section 17F sets out the powers which apply to a patient who is recalled to hospital under section 17E. If the RC decides that the patient meets the 1983 Act's criteria for detention for treatment in hospital (set out in section 3(2)), the RC may, subject to an AMHP's agreement that it is appropriate, revoke the patient's CTO under section 17F(4). The RC can only recall a patient for a maximum of 72 hours without revoking the CTO. Therefore, the RC may release a recalled patient from detention at any time within the first 72 hours, provided the CTO has not been otherwise revoked. On release, the patient continues to remain subject to the CTO.

120. Section 17G provides that when a CTO is revoked (so that the patient is no longer a community patient), the authority to detain the patient under section 6(2) applies (unless the patient is a Part 3 patient), exactly as if the patient had never been a community patient. In addition, all the 1983 Act's provisions apply to the patient as they did when the patient was first admitted to hospital for treatment before the CTO was made (unless the 1983 Act provides otherwise).

121. Section 32 also inserts new sections 20A and 20B which set out how long CTOs will last, and how they can be extended. A new CTO will initially last for 6 months from the date when the order was made. The order can then be extended for a further 6 months and, following that, it can be extended for periods of one year at a time. For an order to be extended under section 20A, the RC must examine the patient and furnish a report to the hospital managers confirming that the conditions, as set out in section 20A(6), are met. The RC must apply exactly the same considerations as when the CTO was first made, so that the RC must again consider the risk that the patient's condition will deteriorate in the community, as a result, for example, of their refusing or neglecting to receive the treatment they need. In considering that risk, the RC must have regard to the patient's history of mental disorder and any other relevant factors. The RC can only make a report to extend the CTO if the grounds for the CTO still apply. An AMHP must agree that the criteria for extension of the CTO are satisfied, and that it is appropriate to extend the CTO, before the report can be made.

Section 33: Relationship with leave of absence

122. Section 33 makes provision in respect of the relationship of SCT with other powers in the 1983 Act. It amends the provisions in the 1983 Act which authorise leave of absence from hospital (section 17). Before granting longer term leave of over 7 consecutive days (or where leave is extended so the total leave granted exceeds 7 consecutive days) a RC must consider whether SCT is the more appropriate way of managing the patient in the community.

Section 34: Consent to treatment

123. Section 34 replaces section 56 of the 1983 Act which sets out the patients to whom Part 4 of that Act, which deals with consent to treatment, applies. In addition to detained patients, informal patients under 18 years of age will be subject to new section 58A of the 1983 Act (see section 27 above). A community patient is not subject to the provisions of Part 4 of the 1983 Act (except section 57 which applies to any patient) unless recalled to hospital for treatment.

124. On recall to hospital, a patient may be given treatment which would otherwise require a certificate under section 58 or 58A of the 1983 Act ("section 58-type treatment" and "section 58A-type treatment") on the basis of a certificate given by a SOAD under the new Part 4A of the 1983 Act (see section 35 below) if that certificate specifies the treatment as being appropriate in these circumstances. If the certificate does not specify any such treatment, then (if it is section 58-type or section 58A-type treatment) it cannot be given on recall unless or until its administration is permitted under Part 4 of the 1983 Act.

125. However, if a certificate covering section 58(1)(b) treatment was in place before the CTO was made, and covers the patient's current treatment needs, there is no need for a new section 58 certificate on recall. If the period from the time the patient first received medication is less than three months then a new certificate under section 58 will not be required until that three month period has elapsed.

126. If a patient's CTO is revoked, so that the patient is once again detained in hospital for treatment, treatment can be given on the basis of a Part 4A certificate only until a section 58 or section 58A certificate can be arranged.

127. A section 58 or section 58A certificate is not required in circumstances where:

• discontinuing the treatment or the plan of treatment at that point would cause serious suffering to the patient as provided for under new section 62A(6);

• the treatment is immediately necessary: immediately necessary treatment can be given under section 62 (which applies by virtue of the application of Part 4 of the Act);

• in the case of administration of medicine, the patient is still within the period before which a certificate is required i.e. either one month has not elapsed from the time when the CTO was made or the three month period from when medication was first given to the patient, as provided for in section 58(1)(b) has not elapsed.

128. A Part 4A certificate will not provide authority to give section 58A type treatment to a patient who has capacity or competence to consent but who refuses consent when recalled or when the community treatment order is revoked.

Section 35: Authority to treat

129. Section 35 introduces a new Part 4A into the 1983 Act to regulate the treatment of community patients whilst in the community i.e. when they are not recalled to hospital. New section 64B gives the authority to treat in the community adult patients who have the capacity to consent. Community patients aged 16 or over with capacity to consent to treatment can only be treated in the community if they do consent to their treatment.

130. Community patients aged 16 or over who lack the capacity to consent to treatment can be treated in the community provided that the treatment is authorised under new section 64D or, where relevant, a donee of a lasting power of attorney (an "attorney" or deputy appointed under the Mental Capacity Act 2005, or the Court of Protection, consents to treatment on their behalf. Section 64D also sets out that force cannot be used to administer treatment if the patient objects to that treatment. If the patient does not object to treatment, force is permitted and that may be in cases where, for example, the patient is suffering from tremor and physical force is needed as a practical measure to administer the treatment. The factors to be considered by a practitioner in determining whether a patient objects to treatment are outlined in new section 64J. If the treatment conflicts with a valid and applicable advance decision made under the MCA, it cannot be given to the patient.

131. Children aged under 16 can also be made subject to a CTO. As with adults who have capacity, treatment cannot be given to a child in the community who is competent to consent and does not consent to it. New section 64F provides the authority to treat a child who lacks competence in the community. Similar conditions must be met in order to treat a child lacking competence as for an adult who lacks capacity (although the conditions do not hinge on concepts in the MCA since powers under that Act cannot in general be exercised in relation to children under 16).

132. Only in emergencies can force be used to give treatment to patients who lack capacity or to children who lack competence against their objections. New section 64G sets out how and when treatment can be given in these situations. Force can be used to give treatment only if it is immediately necessary, needs to be given to prevent harm to the patient, and is a proportionate response to the likelihood of the patient suffering harm and to the seriousness of the harm. The emergency circumstances in which section 58A type treatment can be given to patients who lack capacity or children who lack competence are more limited than the circumstances in which other treatment can be given in emergencies.

133. All community patients receiving the type of treatment which falls under section 58 or 58A of the 1983 Act must have that treatment certified by a SOAD in accordance with the provisions of Part 4A. For treatment specified in section 58(1)(b), i.e. medication, a certificate is not required immediately, but must be in place after a certain period. This period is one month from when a patient leaves hospital or three months from when the medication was first given to the patient (whether that medication was given in the community or in hospital), whichever is later. The SOAD must certify in writing that it is appropriate for the treatment to be given.

134. The SOAD may specify within the certificate that certain treatment can be given to the patient only if certain conditions are satisfied: so, for example, the SOAD could specify that a particular antipsychotic and dosage can only be given in the community if the patient retains capacity to consent to it. The SOAD can also specify whether and if so what treatments can be given to the patient on recall to hospital and the circumstances in which the treatment can be given. For example, the SOAD can specify, if appropriate, that an antipsychotic can be given to the patient on recall without the patient's consent.

135. Under new section 64B, it is not necessary to meet the certificate requirement before treatment can be given in emergencies to a patient in the community where that patient consents to treatment or, for patients who lack capacity, where an attorney, deputy or the Court of Protection consents to it on the patient's behalf.

136. The following table summarises when patients can be treated in the community and the safeguards that are in place for the review of section 58-type and section 58A type treatment: