![]() |
Explanatory Notes to Electronic Communications Act 2000
2000 Chapter 7 |
|
© Crown Copyright 2000 Explanatory Notes to Acts of the UK Parliament are subject to Crown Copyright protection. They may be reproduced free of charge provided that they are reproduced accurately and that the source and copyright status of the material is made evident to users. It should be noted that the right to reproduce the text of these Explanatory Notes does not extend to the Queen's Printer imprints which should be removed from any copies of the Explanatory Notes which are issued or made available to the public. This includes reproduction of the Notes on the internet and on intranet sites. The Royal Arms may be reproduced only where they are an integral part of the original document. The text of this Internet version of the Explanatory Notes which is published by the Queen's Printer of Acts of Parliament has been prepared to reflect the text in printed form and as published by The Stationery Office Limited as the Explanatory Notes to the Electronic Communications Act 2000, ISBN 0105607002. The print version may be purchased by clicking here. Braille copies of the Explanatory Notes can also be purchased at the same price as the print edition by contacting TSO Customer Services on 0870 600 5522 or e-mail:customer.services@tso.co.uk. Further information about the publication of legislation on this website can be found by referring to the Frequently Asked Questions. To ensure fast access over slow connections, large documents have been segmented into "chunks". Where you see a "continue" button at the bottom of the page of text, this indicates that there is another chunk of text available. |
|
|
| |
|
These notes refer to the Electronic Communications Act 2000 (c.7) Electronic Communications Act 2000
EXPLANATORY NOTESINTRODUCTION1. These explanatory notes relate to the Electronic Communications Act which received Royal Assent on 25 May 2000. They have been prepared by the Department of Trade and Industry in order to assist the reader in understanding the Act. They do not form part of the Act and have not been endorsed by Parliament.
2. The notes need to be read in conjunction with the Act. They are not, and are not meant to be, a comprehensive description of the Act. So where a section or part of a section does not seem to require any explanation or comment, none is given.
BACKGROUND3. The Government's policy is to facilitate electronic commerce. It has also set itself targets for making Government services available electronically: all schools and libraries to be connected to the internet by 2002, with 100% of all government services to be deliverable online by 2005. The Government has also set a target for 90% of its routine procurement of goods to be done electronically by 2001.
4. The Government's general policy towards electronic communications and information technology is set out in:
Electronic commerce is developing quickly, as is Government policy on it. Useful sources of up to date information include the websites of the e-envoy (www.e-envoy.gov.uk), which includes a monthly progress report to the Prime Minister, the Cabinet Office Central IT Unit (www.citu.gov.uk) and the DTI (www.dti.gov.uk).
5. Cryptography and electronic signatures are important for electronic transactions.
6. Various organisations provide cryptography services, which include certifying the public key of an individual, managing encryption keys and time stamping electronic signatures. There is a need for the public to be able to have confidence that these services are secure and not open to fraud; and for people to be free from unnecessary restrictions in their use of new technology.
7. The main purpose of the Act is to help build confidence in electronic commerce and the technology underlying it by providing for:
8. The Act also contains provisions to update procedures for modifying telecommunications licences.
9. The Act is in three parts.
INDUSTRY "APPROVALS" SCHEME10. The Government has said that it would prefer to see an industry led approvals process instead of the statutory scheme envisaged in Part I of the Act. The Alliance for Electronic Business (AEB) has drawn up an industry led scheme (known as the tScheme). The Government has said that it will not commence Part I of the Act if it continues to be satisfied that the tScheme meets the Government's objectives. A prospectus detailing the Scheme has been published and is available at www.fei.org.uk/fei/news/tscheme.html.
CONSULTATIONParts I and II11. The first consultation on most of the matters covered by Parts I and II was undertaken by the previous administration in March 1997.
12. The Government announced its response to that consultation, and its policy on the provision of cryptography services, in a parliamentary statement by Mrs Barbara Roche, then Parliamentary Under Secretary of State at the Department of Trade and Industry, on 27 April 1998 (Hansard, HoC, column 27; available on the Parliament website at www.parliament.uk/commons.htm).
13. A broader consultation - "Building Confidence in Electronic Commerce: A Consultation Document" (URN 99/642) (available on the DTI website at www.dti.gov.uk/cii/elec/elec_com.html) - was launched on 5 March 1999. A summary of the responses to this consultation (URN 99/891) is available on the DTI website at www.dti.gov.uk/cii/elec/conrep.htm.
14. The Trade and Industry Select Committee of the House of Commons published a report on the matters covered by the consultation document on 18 May 1999 ("Building Confidence in Electronic Commerce: The Government's Proposals", HC 187; available on the Parliament website at www.parliament.uk/commons/ selcom/t&ihome.htm).
15. A draft of the Electronic Communications Bill was published for consultation on 23 July 1999 in the document "Promoting Electronic Commerce" (Cm 4417) available on the DTI website at: www.dti.gov.uk/cii/elec/ecbill.html. This document also contained the Government's response to the Trade and Industry Select Committee report. A summary of the responses to this consultation (URN 99/1218) is also available on the DTI website (www.dti.gov.uk/cii/elec/billsumm.html) along with copies of the responses themselves (www.dti.gov.uk/cii/elec/ecbill_responses.html).
16. On 3 November 1999, the Trade and Industry Select Committee of the House of Commons published a report on the draft Electronic Communications Bill (HC 862, available on the Parliament website). The Government response was published on 18 January (HC 168, also available on the Parliament website).
Part III17. There have been three formal consultations on the revised licence modification procedure provided for in Part III of the Act. The first, "Licence Modification Procedure: Proposed Changes to the Telecommunications Act 1984" (URN 98/1049), was issued in May 1998; the second, "Licence Modification Procedure: Updated Proposals for Changes to the Telecommunications Act 1984" (URN 99/945), in March 1999 (further details available on the DTI website at www.dti.gov.uk/cii/regulation.html). The third was undertaken as part of the consultation on the draft Electronic Communications Bill.
18. Responses to all of these consultation exercises have contributed to the measures set out in the Act.
THE INTERNATIONAL CONTEXT19. This Act is consistent with, and seeks to implement, certain provisions of the EU Electronic Signatures Directive (1999/93/EC), which was adopted on 13 December 1999 (OJ L 13/12, 19.1.2000). The Directive is intended to facilitate the use of electronic signatures and to contribute to their legal recognition throughout the European Union. Further details can be found on the EU website at: http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/lif/dat/1999/en_399L0093.html. The Act is also compatible with the Cryptography Guidelines, published by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) on 19 March 97 (available on the OECD website at: www.oecd.org/subject/e_commerce), and the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law on Electronic Commerce (available on the UN website at www.un.or.at/uncitral/english/texts/electcom/ml-ec.htm). Finally, the Act is also consistent, in scope and purpose, with the draft Uniform Rules on Electronic Signatures and Certification Authorities, which are currently under development in UNCITRAL.
20. The broad aim of the Act, facilitating electronic commerce, is similar to that of the EU E-Commerce Directive, which seeks to remove barriers to the development of electronic commerce in the internal market, but there is no overlap in the detailed provisions. The main areas addressed in the Directive are simplifying and clarifying rules of establishment, ensuring consistency in approaches to commercial communications, ensuring legal validity of electronic contracts and limiting the liability of intermediary service providers. The Directive was adopted on 4 May 2000 and will appear in the Official Journal in due course. Further information on this Directive is available from the DTI website at www.dti.gov.uk/cii/ecomdirective/index.htm.
COMMENTARY ON SECTIONSPart I Cryptography Service ProvidersSection 1: Register of approved providers21. This section places a duty on the Secretary of State to establish and maintain a register of approved providers of cryptography support services, and specifies what information is to be contained in the register. The section also requires the Secretary of State to make arrangements for the public to have access to the register and for any changes to the information in the register to be publicised.
22. The main purpose of the register is to ensure that providers on the register have been independently assessed against particular standards of quality, in order to encourage the use of their services, and hence the development of electronic commerce and electronic communication with Government.
23. Where two people are communicating electronically, it may be necessary for one person to rely on the services provided to the other: for example, where the first person receives a communication which purports to have been signed electronically by the other.
24. The register is voluntary: no provider is obliged to apply for approval and a provider who is not on the register is at liberty to provide cryptography services.
Section 2: Arrangements for the grant of approvals25. This section places a duty on the Secretary of State to ensure that there are arrangements in force for granting approval, handling complaints and disputes and modifying or withdrawing approval.
26. Subsection (1) places a duty on the Secretary of State to ensure that there are arrangements for granting approvals for any person providing, or proposing to provide, cryptography support services in the United Kingdom, and applying to be approved.
27. Subsection (2) sets out what the arrangements for approvals are to achieve.
28. Subsection (3) says what the Secretary of State must be satisfied about in order to grant an approval. The Secretary of State is given the power to set requirements (e.g. relating to the technology provided, to the person himself and his background and experience, and the way he provides the technology to the public) by regulation, and also to impose conditions on the approval. Subsection (5) of section 5 provides that the Secretary of State must consult before making regulations imposing requirements. The Secretary of State must also be satisfied that the person is fit and proper to be approved. Relevant factors include any known contraventions of provisions of this legislation, and convictions for offences involving fraud or dishonesty, or engaging in discriminatory practices, or engaging in deceitful, oppressive, unfair or improper business practices.
29. Subsection (4) allows for regulations made by virtue of subsection (3)(a) or (b) to frame the requirement for compliance with these requirements by reference to the opinion of a person specified, either in the regulations or chosen in a manner set out in the regulations.
30. Subsection (5) specifies the nature of the requirements which may be imposed as conditions of an approval, subject to the limits in subsection (6).
31. Subsection (7) provides for the enforcement of any requirement to provide information imposed by the conditions of an approval by the Secretary of State in civil proceedings.
32. Subsections (8) and (9) make provision about the payment of fees.
33. Subsection (10) sets out what is meant by cryptography support services being provided in the United Kingdom.
34. The arrangements for approvals, outlined above, envisage providers requesting approval for one or a number of different cryptography support services. The granting of such an approval would depend on the applicant meeting the conditions specified in the relevant regulations.
Section 3: Delegation of approval functions35. This section enables the Secretary of State to delegate the approvals functions set out in sections 1 and 2 to any person. Subsection (4) provides that where the functions are delegated to a statutory body or office holder, the statutes relating to their original functions shall be regarded as including the new functions so delegated. Subsection (5) enables the Secretary of State to modify enactments by order, and subsection (6) provides that the order required to do this will be subject to affirmative resolution procedure in both Houses of Parliament.
Section 4: Restrictions on disclosure of information36. This section protects certain information obtained under Part I, sets out the purposes for which it may be disclosed (e.g. in order to carry out the approvals functions, for a criminal investigation or for those civil proceedings specified in subsection (2)(e)) and makes improper disclosure a criminal offence. It safeguards individual privacy and commercially confidential information, except where disclosure is justifiable.
37. There is no restriction on who may make the disclosure or to whom it may be made, provided that the purpose is proper.
Section 5: Regulations under Part I38. This section makes further provision relating to the regulations the Secretary of State may make under Part I and contains standard provisions commonly accorded to powers to make subordinate legislation, such as an ability to make supplementary provision. The regulations will be subject to affirmative resolution procedure in both Houses of Parliament the first time the Secretary of State exercises his powers to make regulations under this Part. They will subsequently be subject to negative resolution procedure in both Houses of Parliament.
Section 6: Provision of cryptography support services39. This section provides for the interpretation of various terms used in Part I of the Act.
40. Subsection (2) makes it clear that the approval scheme for cryptography support services includes only those services that primarily involve a continuing relationship between the supplier of the service and the customer. The scheme does not cover the supply of an item (whether software or hardware) unless such a supply is integral to the provision of the service itself.
41. Cryptography support services, falling within the scope of this section, would include registration and certification in relation to certificates, time-stamping of certificates or documents, key generation and management, key-storage and providing directories of certificates.
Part II Facilitation of electronic commerce, data storage, etc.Section 7: Electronic signatures and related certificates42. This section provides for the admissibility of electronic signatures and related certificates in legal proceedings.
43. It will be for the court to decide in a particular case whether an electronic signature has been correctly used and what weight it should be given (e.g. in relation to the authentication or integrity of a message) against other evidence. Some businesses have contracted with each other about how they are to treat each other's electronic communications. Section 7 does not cast any doubt on such arrangements.
44. Subsection (1) allows an electronic signature, or its certification, to be admissible as evidence in respect of any question regarding the authenticity or integrity of an electronic communication or data. Authenticity and integrity are both defined in section 15(2):
45. Subsection (2) defines an electronic signature for the purposes of the section.
46. Subsection (3) explains what is meant by certified in this context.
Section 8: Power to modify legislation47. This power is designed to remove restrictions arising from other legislation which prevent the use of electronic communications or storage in place of paper, and to enable the use of electronic communications or storage of electronic data to be regulated where it is already allowed. Its potential application in such cases means that it is narrower in scope than section 7, which applies wherever electronic signatures are used, including those cases where there is no legislative impediment to the electronic option. The power can be used selectively to offer the electronic alternative to those who want it.
48. There are a large number of provisions in statutes on many different topics, which require the use of paper or which might be interpreted to require this. Many of these cases involve communication with Government Departments by businesses or individuals - including submitting information or applying for licences or permits. Other cases concern communications between businesses and individuals, where there is a statutory requirement that the communication should be on paper. The power can be used in any of these cases, and is not limited to the provision of written information:
49. Some examples of the way in which the power could be used relate to the Companies Act 1985. On 5 March 1999 the DTI consulted about whether the Act should be changed to enable companies to use electronic means to deliver company communications, to receive shareholder proxy and voting instructions and to incorporate. The consultation letter "Electronic Communication: Change To The Companies Act 1985" is available from DTI's Company Law and Investigations Directorate, telephone 020 7215 0409. A draft order, which the Government proposes to make under this power, was published for consultation in February 2000 and is available by phoning the same telephone number and at www.dti.gov.uk/cld.condocs.htm
50. The Government will also ensure a co-ordinated approach among Departments and issue guidance for their use. This accords with the observation in the Performance and Innovation Unit report e-commerce@its.best.uk (para 10.45) that "A significant degree of co-ordination will be needed to ensure that measures to acknowledge legal equivalence of written and digital signatures marches in step between departments". This role has been assigned to the Central IT Unit in the Cabinet Office, which provides the policy lead for developing Information Age Government under the Modernising Government agenda. The Cabinet Office is developing guidelines to ensure that Departments follow a consistent approach.
51. There are, however, many communications where paper is not currently required by law - for example the vast majority of contracts fall into this category. People will remain free to undertake transactions of this kind using whatever form of communication they wish.
52. Subsection (1) gives the appropriate Minister the power to modify, by order made by statutory instrument, the provisions of any enactment or subordinate legislation, or instruments made under such legislation, for which he is responsible. He may authorise or facilitate the use of electronic communications or electronic storage (instead of other methods of communication or storage) for any purpose mentioned in subsection (2). This power is limited by subsection (3) which places a duty on the Minister not to make such an order unless he considers that authorising the option of electronic communication or storage will not result in arrangements for record-keeping that are less satisfactory than before. It is also limited by subsection (6).
53. Subsection (2) describes the purposes for which modification by an order may be made.
54. Subsections (4) and (5) specify the types of provision about electronic communications or the use of electronic storage that may be made in an order under this section.
55. Subsection (6) provides that an order under this section cannot require the use of electronic communications or electronic storage. However, when someone has previously chosen the electronic option, the variation or withdrawal of such a choice may be subject to a period of notice specified in the order.
56. Subsection (7) provides that this section does not apply to matters under the care and management of the Commissioners of Inland Revenue or the Commissioners of Customs and Excise. Such matters are already covered in sections 132 and 133 of the Finance Act 1999.
Section 9: Supplemental provision about section 8 orders57. This section says who may make section 8 orders, and sets out supplementary provisions relating to such orders; it contains standard provisions commonly accorded to powers to make subordinate legislation, such as an ability to make supplementary provision.
58. Subsections (3) and (4) provide that the regulations made under section 8 will be subject to a choice of either affirmative or negative resolution procedure in both Houses of Parliament. The Government intends to use affirmative resolution at least for the first order, so that the general principles can be debated. Subsection (7) provides for the power to be exercised by the Scottish Ministers, with the consent of the Secretary of State, in relation to Scottish devolved matters. Scottish legislation is brought within the ambit of the power by virtue of the definitions of enactment and subordinate legislation in section 15.
| |
| |
![]() | |
| Other Explanatory Notes | Home | Her Majesty's Stationery Office | |
| We welcome your comments on this site | © Crown Copyright 2000 | Prepared: 16 June 2000 |